Go
to original
review at www.audioasylum.com
Dear All,
I
have had the opportunity to audition the EAR
Acute CD player and can now finally comment
on this player versus the ARC Reference CD7
and Ayre CX-7e CD players.
At
the end of this review, I will conclude with
an analysis of the three players, with the five
different scoring categories:
Lows
(L)
Mids (M)
Highs (H)
Soundstage (S)
Dynamics (D)
I
will begin with a general prologue first and
then give my own personal ratings at the end,
which are subjective entirely to listening in
my own system, using balanced XLR connections.
In
measure mode (preferred mode) the Ayre CX-7e
CD unit comes along as a player having great
impact, dynamics and punch. I have had this
unit for approximately two years now and it
certainly has flaws when you compare it to the
best of the best. Some review sites reward and
praise this player particularly highly. IMHO,
this player lacks mid-range warmth and, in particular,
there is no forwardness of the music with a
limited compressed soundstage. It has bloated
bass and a slight treble bloom, but these ultimately
cannot make up for the lack of midrange magic.
The rear soundstage is there and perhaps too
much of it, as it empties itself into an abyss.
Some may prefer this type of sound, but honestly,
I cannot tolerate this especially considering
the music does not project forward enough. Lateral
width is as good as the best players around.
Yes, it is incredibly dynamic, but this is the
mere illusion of this unit. Yes, this player
does suffer from “digititus” and
in a very bad way. Another pertinent issue I
noticed with this unit is slightly slower timing
speed compared to the other CD players, resulting
in a darker portrayal of the music.
Next
is the ARC Reference CD7 unit, which is a true
reference class CD player. It is characterised
by lovely 6H30 sounding analogue tubes. In fact,
its sound is so characteristic and very similar
to that of the Pathos Endorphin CD player, which
happens to utilise the same tubes, using two
instead of seven. Where the Endorphin loses
out is with output voltage level, with the CD7
producing in excess of 5.4 volts, whereas the
Endorphin limits itself to 2 volts output. This
clearly enables the ARC CD7 to bellow out huge
dynamic sounding volumes quite easily from to
top to bottom. The sound of the ARC CD7 is more
complete and full of everything. It is extremely
neutral sounding and certainly has qualities
which justify the high price of this unit. I
almost found the top end of this unit bordering
on the verge of harsh or fatiguing, but did
not have enough time to accurately test this
further with longer listening audition periods.
The player construction is world class, having
the Philips Pro transport just like the Pathos
Endorphin CD player. The 6H30 tube is synonymous
to the best E88CC/6922 NOS tubes going around
and maximises warmth in all areas of the audible
frequency spectrum. It is the best tube going
around at the moment for manufacturers, but
the E88CC/6922 NOS stock, especially late 50’s
and very early 60’s vintage certainly
hold their own against the 6H30, as I will speak
about this later. By the way, my Pathos Logos
integrated amplifier has Eindhoven manufactured
pinched waist d-getter 1956 Valvo CCa yellow-labelled
tubes in use.
The
EAR Acute CD unit is a unique player, with extreme
resolution. Every musical instrument sounds
actually like a real musical instrument and
voices actually sound like real voices. No,
it does not have the transport of the Phillips
Pro mechanism or the construction of the ARC
unit, but what it does have is a sound which
is rich, luscious, organic and tonally correct.
Let me begin with the frequency band. On the
stock TdP EI PCC88 tubes, it offers enormous
midrange warmth, texture and detail. It produces
an extraordinary soundstage, bordering on infinite,
and is truly reference class in this department.
The forward stage is enormous, with music going
behind the listening environment and filling
all areas of the room. Yes, it’s that
big. The rear stage depth and lateral spread
are also outstanding. Where the stock tubes
fail is in the top and bottom ends. I have replaced
the stock tubes with Siemens 1963 vintage E88CC
grey plate tubes and this player has now truly
blown me away even further, with analogue transparent
high resolution sound emanating. The Siemens
E88CC tubes provide even more airy soundstage,
forwardness and depth, I kid you not. The extension
in the frequencies has resulted in the most
sonically neutral sound I have ever heard. The
sound is truly gorgeous and palpable. What’s
more interesting is that the Siemens E88CC tubes
have now provided a level of body to the instruments,
which now presents the sound with a holographic
appearance, with high resolution. Yes, it feels
like you can reach out and just touch the instruments.
Words do not describe this sound, as you truly
have to experience it to understand why this
unit is regarded a true reference player by
some reviewers. The unit comes with some caveats
too, which fortunately do not degrade the sound.
An Arcam CD73 transport and Wolfson DAC’s,
which now that I have heard agree with TdP that
yes, they are the best analogue sounding DAC’s
going around. It seems these up-sampling players
are the future with CD sound.
So,
where do I conclude with all this information?
Let
me summarise by giving my own rating score.
Of course, it’s entirely subjective to
my own system and many will disagree, but I
think it’s a realistic view of what I
have heard.
For
those out there, please don’t flame me
from posting my own findings.
Ayre
Cx-7e:
H
= 8/10
M = 4/10
L = 8/10
D = 8/10
S = 5/10
ARC
CD7:
H
= 9~10/10
M = 8/10 (I thought it was the best until I
heard the Acute)
L = 9~10/10
D = 10/10
S = 8~9/10
EAR
Acute with Siemens 1960’s NOS:
H
= 9~10/10
M =10/10 (the best midrange ever with extraordinary
detail)
L = 10/10 (the bass is more tight and deeper
than the Ayre on par with ARC and even better
textured than the two)
D = 9/10
S =10/10 (exceptional reference standard)
EAR
Acute with EI PC88 Stock tubes:
H
= 6/10
M = 9/10 (highly intoxicating and captured my
attention instantaneously)
L = 8/10
D = 7/10
S = 9/10
There
you have it, three CD players all reviewed.
I could also include the Pathos Digit and Endorphin
CD players, but will leave those until another
time.
Ciao.
XLR8OR
|
|